Comments on: JackenIAX with multiple lines support http://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/ Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:04:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: GuiltyDoghttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-9438 GuiltyDog Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:52:23 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-9438 <p>I need this but I only have 10.3.9. It won't even launch :(</p> I need this but I only have 10.3.9. It won’t even launch :(

]]> By: Quentin Stafford-Fraserhttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8279 Quentin Stafford-Fraser Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:31:59 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-8279 <p>Agreed - this is a lovely app and the prefix code is very useful, though I too would like it only to apply to things dialled from the Address Book.</p><p>What I'd really like is the ability to choose between more than one Asterisk server, or more than one different account on a server, either by having multiple windows or tabs, or by being able to run two instances at the same time...</p><p>All the best, Quentin</p> Agreed – this is a lovely app and the prefix code is very useful, though I too would like it only to apply to things dialled from the Address Book.

What I’d really like is the ability to choose between more than one Asterisk server, or more than one different account on a server, either by having multiple windows or tabs, or by being able to run two instances at the same time…

All the best, Quentin

]]> By: Jon Beattiehttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8176 Jon Beattie Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:22:06 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-8176 <p>I've had lots of problems with Idefisk and Loudhush, but JackenIAX works perfectly. I am currently in London connecting back to our Asterisk server in New Zealand and voice quality is fantastic. The only feature I really need is the ability to transfer calls as we use Asterisk as our office phone system. I encourage you to continue to develop this product and release it commercially. We would happily pay for this.</p> I’ve had lots of problems with Idefisk and Loudhush, but JackenIAX works perfectly. I am currently in London connecting back to our Asterisk server in New Zealand and voice quality is fantastic. The only feature I really need is the ability to transfer calls as we use Asterisk as our office phone system. I encourage you to continue to develop this product and release it commercially. We would happily pay for this.

]]> By: Jackenhttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8093 Jacken Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:09:21 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-8093 <p>Yep, that's the reason I released this version. The security problem mentioned is patched. Good idea about version numbers. As soon as I get time to change my site over to Drupal, I'll add it.</p> Yep, that’s the reason I released this version. The security problem mentioned is patched. Good idea about version numbers. As soon as I get time to change my site over to Drupal, I’ll add it.

]]> By: voip lurkerhttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8069 voip lurker Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:39:30 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-8069 <p>Suggestionette: consider adding a section to the FAQ or elsewhere that indentifies the source versions you are using. This came up as a result of the AXclient vulnerability mentioned here:</p><p>http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=548&idxseccion=10</p> Suggestionette: consider adding a section to the FAQ or elsewhere that indentifies the source versions you are using. This came up as a result of the AXclient vulnerability mentioned here:

http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=548&idxseccion=10

]]> By: Alaric Snell-Pymhttp://www.jackenhack.com/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/comment-page-1/#comment-7888 Alaric Snell-Pym Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:40:47 +0000 http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2006/06/06/jackeniax-with-multiple-lines-support/#comment-7888 <p>Thanks for the new version of JackenIAX!</p><p>I was delighted to see the new dial prefix option, since I have set my Asterisk PBX up to dial 9 for an outside line, but my address book (since it is synched to my mobile) has all the numbers in "pure" E164 format.</p><p>However, when I tried it, I found that it prefixed 9 to numbers I entered manually as well, so I can't then call my internal extensions!</p><p>Pretty please can we have a way of adding a prefix to address book numbers, but not to ALL numbers?</p><p>Thanks!</p> Thanks for the new version of JackenIAX!

I was delighted to see the new dial prefix option, since I have set my Asterisk PBX up to dial 9 for an outside line, but my address book (since it is synched to my mobile) has all the numbers in “pure” E164 format.

However, when I tried it, I found that it prefixed 9 to numbers I entered manually as well, so I can’t then call my internal extensions!

Pretty please can we have a way of adding a prefix to address book numbers, but not to ALL numbers?

Thanks!

]]>